![]() 02/20/2016 at 15:23 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
SLK230 in Central NJ for !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 02/20/2016 at 15:35 |
|
Fine me a manual 320 or a 32 AMG and we will talk
![]() 02/20/2016 at 16:31 |
|
Complete wish pep boys spec radio
![]() 02/21/2016 at 18:27 |
|
Too bad I’ve sworn off I4s, and ‘automatic-trans sports cars’
![]() 02/22/2016 at 18:39 |
|
Buying a hardtop 320 with a 3rd pedal from my sales guy; white, should go well with the C55.
![]() 02/22/2016 at 19:32 |
|
I think I am going to get a 32 AMG here soon.
![]() 02/23/2016 at 16:19 |
|
C32 is a pretty kick ass car, you'll enjoy the hell out of it!
![]() 02/23/2016 at 16:24 |
|
SLK
![]() 02/25/2016 at 19:34 |
|
SLK over C55 AMG?
![]() 02/25/2016 at 19:41 |
|
Oh yes very much so. Mostly cause I really don’t like the look of most 4 door Mercs and the SLK is beautiful and a hardtop convertible. Now I would take a CLK63 AMG Black if that was in my price range.
![]() 02/26/2016 at 19:02 |
|
I might agree with you on the newer SLK’s but the ones from this vintage (late 90's, early 00's) look like total chick cars to me... it’s why I’m buying it for my wife ;-) I drive the C55 AMG as a daily and need 4 doors.
![]() 02/26/2016 at 19:38 |
|
Eww, the newer ones are too squat and the front end is hideous. I love the look of the early 2000's model. Its small, but lots of room and classic Mercedes lines. Now a newer Sl.... but those are way too much. Plus yes the 230K is definitely a “chick” car, but I love the 32AMG and can totally be a mans car.